To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Clearing fog on the Waterfront
Share this:
We have been told that the unpublished report, commissioned by the Treasury, says that taxpayers could end up footing a bill for £50 million in connection with the Esplanade project. With this in mind, it is hardly surprising that Deputy Le Fondré is suspicious about a previous administration’s motives for failing to come clean about what consultants King Sturge had to say.
It must, however, be emphasised that the present Treasury Minister, Senator Philip Ozouf, vehemently rejects the assertion that the taxpayer could be forced to foot a huge bill. Indeed, he says that development could yield public benefits amounting to many millions of pounds.
But in spite of the Senator’s confidence, many will feel that all available information concerning this prominent site should be on the table – although it is fair to say that that events have moved on dramatically since 2008. The proposed development is now much smaller than initially envisaged,
government has parted company with the organisation which was formerly the preferred developer, and the States of Jersey Development Company is limbering up to take on the job.
But there have been other changes which might mean that though the secret report could still be informative, its relevance has been severely undermined. Since 2008 the world has seen a major recession and Jersey has experienced a fall in demand for the sort of facilities promised as central features of the remodelled Esplanade.
More importantly, another player eager not for involvement in the States-backed plan but to launch its own prestige redevelopment of the Broad Street area has appeared on the scene.
Although Deputy Le Fondré undoubtedly has principle on his side, the make-or-break for what its proponents would like to call the Esplanade Quarter is likely to be defined not by a hypothetical £50 million bombshell for taxpayers but by competition from the Broad Street scheme, the extent to which the economy recovers and realistic assessments of the medium- and long-term demand for top-quality office space.
Related
Most read this week...
More from the JEP
Discover a welcome daily grind at historic mill’s first used book sale
Constable race in town adds fifth runner
Parish accounts official to campaign for Assembly role
Hospitality worker confirmed for St Helier Central