ACCESS to reproductive healthcare “must not be dependent on financial means”, a scrutiny panel has warned as it welcomed “long overdue” changes to the Island’s abortion law.

The Health and Social Security Scrutiny Panel said it supports the draft Termination of Pregnancy (Jersey) Law, due to be debated this week – but stressed that legal reform alone will not guarantee better services for Islanders.

“The panel strongly believes that equitable access to reproductive healthcare must not be dependent on financial means,” the report said, adding that Jersey should move towards a system where terminations are provided free of charge “as part of a comprehensive and equitable reproductive health care system”.

The report examines the draft Termination of Pregnancy (Jersey) Law, lodged earlier this year by the Health Minister, which would replace the Island’s existing 1997 legislation.

Srutiny members cautioned that there may be a significant gap between what the law permits and what the Island’s health service can actually deliver.

“Jersey’s small healthcare workforce and specialist requirements for later stage terminations mean that procedures after 12 weeks are unlikely to be widely available on Island in the near term,” the report said.

“Nonetheless, the panel agree that the intent of the changes are clear and supports the
clarity provided to clinicians and removal of stigma that may be associated, particularly
with late-stage termination and having to travel for a procedure that is not lawful where
you live.”

Jersey’s current abortion legislation requires Islanders to justify a termination on specific grounds such as “distress” – something the panel describes as outdated and inconsistent with modern medical guidance.

The modernisation of Jersey’s legal framework to permit termination before 22 weeks without the need to justify grounds is welcomed by the panel.

Scrutineers also praised plans to remove the existing requirement to consult two doctors
before accessing a termination. Instead, only one in-person consultation with a registered medical practitioner would be required for all terminations before 22 weeks.

The report welcomed this change as “a positive and progressive development, ensuring that access remains safe and clinically robust while also supporting women’s reproductive autonomy and aligning Jersey with many comparable jurisdictions where early terminations are permitted on request”.

But the panel raised concerns about cases where foetal abnormalities are only detected at the routine 20-week scan.

Members warned that the proposed 21 weeks and six days limit leaves families with very little time to process complex medical information, seek further tests and make an informed decision.

The scrutiny report says this compressed timeframe could leave patients feeling rushed into a termination before the deadline, even when the abnormality is not serious.

Scrutineers suggested that ministers should consider allowing a short extension — up to 23 weeks and six days in such cases — to give parents more time to weigh their options without forcing them into what the panel describes as an unnecessarily stressful and complex situation.

The debate over abortion access also forms part of a much wider conversation about the financial pressures faced by women in Jersey.

From paying for contraception and abortions, to fertility treatment, childcare and even period products, campaigners argue that the cumulative costs associated with women’s health and family life place a disproportionate burden on women across the Island.

Turn to page 8 for our special International Women’s Day report examining the cost of being a woman in Jersey– and the growing calls for government action to address what one major health assessment described as “systemic gender inequalities” affecting women and girls across the Island.

Read the JEP’s special report, coinciding with International Women’s Day yesterday, examining the cost of being a woman in Jersey – and the growing calls for government action to address what one major health assessment described as “systemic gender inequalities” affecting women and girls across the Island