To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
The year Reform peaked?
Share this:
CONVENTIONAL wisdom maintains that Senator John Le Fondré’s allegedly secret agreement with Reform Jersey before the election for Chief Minister was unwise, even disingenuous. Superficially, this argument carries some weight.
Why should the aspiring Chief Minister have courted, even appeased, a political party which, outside its heartland areas, was emphatically rejected by voters? Remember, Senator Mézec scraped the eighth Senatorial place by just 123 votes, Deputy Tadier came within 47 votes of being ousted and 13 out of its 18 candidates were defeated.
Criticism of Senator Le Fondré for lack of transparency is certainly justified: but neither is Reform Jersey itself blameless. States Members voting in the election for Chief Minister were entitled to know of the agreement’s existence and implications: yet both parties, seemingly, chose not to disclose it.
That apart, however, the new Chief Minister is perhaps more astute than he is being given credit for.
Reform Jersey’s relative ‘success,’ such as it is, has so far been cultivated from the luxury of constant opposition, without ever having to bear any responsibility for either implementation or consequences of their Left-leaning policies.
Occupying ministerial office, they may find such contact with reality uncomfortable.
Take the joint pledge to work towards a £10 per hour minimum wage: evidently, some still believe the state can arbitrarily raise the floor-price of human labour without employers either using less of it or finding a non-human substitute.
But in Seattle, the move towards a $15 per hour minimum wage is seeing high-wage labour replaced by non-wage automation. McDonalds, meanwhile, will be 100% self-service kiosks in half of all its US outlets by the end of 2018.
In ministerial office and directly responsible for their introduction and operation, Reform Jersey’s politicians will be tainted, and blamed, when any adverse effects of their misguided leftist policies emerge, instead of being conveniently insulated from them as now.
They may well find their own popularity suffers. 2018 might even prove to have been their peak. If so, the Chief Minister’s ‘mistake’ may turn out to have been a masterstroke.
Related