To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Making the most of savings
Share this:
This achievement, which has seen some departments underspending by more than £3 million, demonstrates that the necessity of controlling costs in the public sector is, at least in this respect, being taken as seriously as it should be – although the growth of the sector as a whole still appears to be relentless.
In total, the underspends amount to £27.6 million and £22.1 million of this will be returned to departments as funds carried forward to finance a great many projects. In addition, £5.5 million will be retained centrally to meet contingencies.
Although the savings that have been made will be generally welcomed, questions arise. For example, some might inquire why what amounts to a windfall of almost £30 million will not be used to reduce forecast deficits.
There are at least two major reasons why the Council of Ministers has not chosen this course of action.
Firstly, if departments are aware that underspends – or at least significant parts of them – can be carried forward, they will be far less inclined to exercise restraint and to avoid the old and wasteful practice of a last-minute spend to exhaust of budget for fear of the surplus being taken away. Three-year budgeting has also been instrumental in abolishing the end-of-period spend-fest.
Secondly, the sums now available offer a precious opportunity to spend in ways which will inject money into the economy and help get people back into work. The underlying notion is that spurring growth could be a better tactic for addressing the deficit than the retention of funds.
Meanwhile, the list of departmental projects which will benefit from carry-forward spending is long and encompasses everything from back-to-work schemes to spending on the emergency services. We are assured that each and every one of these initiatives has been assessed and approved by the Treasury Minister, the States Treasurer and the Council of Ministers. That, in itself, qualifies as a major undertaking.
If, however, there is anything to regret about the underspend picture it is that revenue is still so tight that nothing can yet be spared to rebuild the Stabilisation Fund, the reserve designed to even out the highs and lows of the economic cycle.
Related
Most read this week...
More from the JEP
Jersey Bulls seal top three finish with 3-0 win over Hastings United
Former minister lines up tilt at a return to political fray
“It would be easy to say that liking Jersey is part of my job – but I truly love it here”
Law Officers’ Department remains tight-lipped on Abramovich case