To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Migration law needs teeth
Share this:
However, although the immigration problem is currently in the spotlight – not least because of the dramatic increase over the past ten years in the number of people living here – they can hardly be described as new issues. For decades housing laws and the Regulation of Undertakings have amounted to an acknowledgement of the need to restrain inward migration.
Unfortunately, as the latest population statistics indicate, control policies have had only a limited effect. As Deputy Sean Power, chairman of the Scrutiny sub-panel investigating immigration management, has pointed out, there have been no prosecutions under the Regulation of Undertakings for more than 40 years. He takes the view that too little has been done on this front for far too long, with consequent adverse pressure on public services and Island infrastructure.
Deputy Power’s conclusion is that it is high time to get tough, and it is difficult to disagree with what he says. Although the Island is soon likely to see an entirely new law designed to control housing and work opportunities, that law will need real teeth if it is to operate more effectively than the regulations which have served us so poorly for so many years.
The Deputy and his sub-panel colleagues say that the teeth should take the shape of photographic identity cards and immigration inspectors empowered to raid building sites, kitchens and other places of work to identify people working illegally. In addition, they suggest that the public should be encouraged to blow the whistle on white-van men plying their trade outside the law.
These ideas might have an uncomfortable flavour of Big Brother about them and may even lead to talk of the German Occupation and the darker meaning of identity cards during that era, but the scrutineers have hit the nail squarely on the head when it comes to making any new law bite. If it is not enforced, it will be ineffective.
Related