They should turn down a pay rise

In the light of a recent development, Mr Cameron’s words should be heeded by our own States Members, who are in line to receive a pay rise next year in the region of 1.8 per cent. That rise has been recommended by the independent panel which sits to consider the remuneration States remuneration, but it is up to Members to decide whether it is appropriate for them to accept what is on offer.

In pondering this issue, Members will, of course, be aware that thousands of States employees are being denied pay rises. It is argued that in the present economic circumstances an increase in the public sector wage bill cannot be countenanced.

It therefore seems clear that what is good for the goose must also be good for the gander. Any Member with a shred of integrity should say thank you very much to the pay panel for its efforts but no thank you to the pay rise.

This is not merely a matter of fairness – it is also about political nous and an appreciation of the importance of good public relations. Acceptance of the 1.8 per cent – or any increase at all – would further undermine the reputation of Members and help to convince the electorate that those whom they rely on to make wise policy are out of touch.

In addition, the effect of an increase for the 51 people sitting in the States on the mood of those negotiating terms and conditions for public sector workers is not hard to imagine.

Under present regulations, the States increase will be automatic if it is not challenged by a potential recipient, so the way forward is clear. And it seems that the Constable of St Saviour, Sadie Rennard, is preparing to accept the challenge by actively opposing the recommendation.

However, she has already pledged not to take the money – amounting to an extra £818 a year – if it is paid. This, of course, is an option open to all Members who see the absurdity of accepting what amounts to preferential treatment in a time of necessary austerity.