To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Finding a future for the Fort
Share this:
Now a new steering committee, led by Deputy James Reed, is readdressing the knotty problem posed by the Fort, which ultimately boils down to two questions – what is it really for and how can it be made to make commercial sense?
It will be interesting to see if the new committee can make progress where others have failed, though many observers will be dismayed to see that their exercise is already generating ridiculous jargon. We are told that the committee’s interim report includes a ‘draft vision’, a grandiose phrase of the sort that Islanders have learned to view with suspicion.
They will, for example, be all too aware that there was once a ‘vision’ for the St Helier Waterfront, but that it disappeared a long time ago in a welter of piecemeal third-rate vulgarity.
However, sceptical as many people will be about any public body’s chances of finally solving the conundrum of the Fort after decades of manifest failure, this does not mean that the effort should not be made. After all, the Fort, in its dominant position above town and with its core of deeply traditional granite architecture capped by structures which still look futuristic, has a great deal going for it.
With this in mind, plus the realisation that old formulae based on leisure and sport with the addition of sometimes bizarre embellishments such as funfairs and model aircraft exhibitions have never worked, a complete rethink is called for.
It is not, of course, necessary to rule out sport and leisure – indeed they are likely to be essential ingredients of any sustainable plan – but other possibilities, such as residential development and perhaps a restaurant with the best views in the Island, must be considered.
Above all, the new committee would best serve the public by reaching a conclusion that should have been reached years ago – that private enterprise should be heavily involved in turning the Fort into a profitable asset of which the whole Island can genuinely be proud.
Related