To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Another Waterfront mystery
Share this:
It seems extraordinary that such a sum is being spent on a facility which, in the opinion of many of its users, is inferior to leisure pools in other resorts and also poorly equipped for serious swimming events. It is even more extraordinary that money can be frittered away so freely when public services as a whole are under the shadow of major cuts.
Moreover, as Senator Breckon has also pointed out, the subsidy figure was lurking coyly in the second appendix of the States Report and Accounts, a document running to 204 pages.
It is not necessarily true that an attempt was made to place the pool information in an obscure place, but many will be tempted to believe that this was the case – especially if they entertain serious doubts about the true extent of ministers’ much-vaunted commitment to open government.
Senator Breckon is quite rightly concerned about the Serco subsidy against the background of public sector finances and economies being made in areas which, he fears, will hit the poorest Islanders hardest. He and others would doubtless also like to know how the subsidy came to be paid in the first place and how it can possibly be justified in commercial terms.
Meanwhile, with other Waterfront attractions boarded up – figuratively, if not literally – because of leasing issues, the pool and its massive subsidy add another lamentable chapter to the sorry saga of what was meant to be the Island’s most prestigious development but which is, in reality, a massive disappointment.
In addition, the latest revelation focuses attention on just how badly the whole issue of swimming pools has been handled over the course of many years. Not only do we have a Waterfront pool of questionable quality, we also have the sad remnant of the Fort Regent pool – which was never an attractive building, even in its heyday – gently decaying on the St Helier skyline.
Neither of these buildings reflects well on the vision or wisdom of those among our political representatives responsible for their creation or present state.
Related