To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Heritage bodies must have input on ‘exceptional developments’
Share this:
From Mike Le Cornu.
IN recognising the need to ‘respond to the Islanders’ concerns expressed so strongly at the Line in the Sand event,’ Senator Cohen nevertheless leaves open a channel through which ‘exceptional development’ could be permitted.
Frankly, if the Senator wishes to enjoy credibility, and to fulfil the aspirations of the protesters, the permission for any future development should only be sanctioned by the unanimous approval of the National Trust, the Société Jersiaise as well as the Planning Committee, which he leads.
Only in this manner can the ‘development please’ lobby be controlled and democracy prevail.
Related