Proposals have been drawn up which would see a radical overhaul of the Premier League in an attempt to safeguard the future of clubs below the top flight.

A number of changes are in the plans, called Project Big Picture, and here the PA news agency takes a closer look at what is being proposed.

Why is this happening?

Empty grounds have compounded the financial impact of the coronavirus crisis
Empty grounds have compounded the financial impact of the coronavirus crisis (Tess Derry/PA)

Who has instigated the plan?
The plan has been three years in the making with Liverpool and Manchester United, England’s two most successful and powerful clubs, at the forefront. Rick Parry, the Premier League’s original chief executive, has been in place at the EFL just over a year and has been working on a solution to the perennial funding problem, claiming parachute payments (which clubs receive when they are relegated) are an “evil that needs to be eradicated”. He is fully onboard with the plans and believes the majority of EFL clubs will be too.

Why are the plans controversial?

Most consecutive seasons in Premier League
The nine longest-serving clubs would get greater voting rights (PA graphic)

So how does this benefit the EFL?
The proposal, on adoption of the plan, is for an immediate £350million rescue package to the EFL and Football Association (£250million/£100m), followed by annual solidarity payments to the EFL of 25 per cent of Premier League revenue (up from four per cent) and a yearly infrastructure funding package of six per cent of Premier League gross revenues to be distributed to the top four divisions.

What will be the opposition to it?

If adopted Project Big Picture would place the power in the hands of the established so-called ‘Big Six’ – Liverpool, Manchester United, Manchester City, Arsenal, Chelsea and Tottenham – with the nine longest-serving clubs having unprecedented power, with the votes of just six of them required to make major changes. That obviously takes the power away from the other top-flight sides who currently enjoy one-club, one-vote status, with a majority of 14 currently required for any significant decisions to be passed.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *