To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
They should receive fair compensation
Share this:
From Maurice le Cocq.
I AM delighted that justice has at last been done and that the Pinels have won their case against Planning for the terrible injustice that was done to them over the move of Reg’s skips.
However, for the life of me I cannot see how Freddie Cohen has to ‘consider’ whether to compensate the couple for the expense, stress and worry that they have had to undergo in the last five years.
Not only should all their legal costs be paid, but they should get adequate and fair compensation for the appalling pressure that they have had to live under over the last few years, with the ever present threat of losing their business, as should also apply to the owner of Heatherbrae Farm, Chris Taylor.
Planning’s decision was blatantly wrong and they compounded their error by trying to ignore the situation, due, no doubt, to the fact that the Pinels had powerful legal neighbours. Instead of accepting that they had made a mistake, they tried for years to blame the innocent Pinels for the situation they were in, instead of accepting the blame and trying to remedy the situation.
Can there please be no ‘consideration’ of the compensation claim? Both the Pinels and Mr Taylor should be reimbursed in full as a matter of right and justice for what they have had to put up with – and with steps taken to ensure that such a situation doesn’t occur again in the future.
Related