To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
‘Our’ new hospital is the vision of a few ministers
Share this:
WHICH will end first, the 50-year life span of ‘our hospital’ or all of us and future generations paying for it?
Finally, 70 pages of ‘provisional’ plans etc are (only) online (ourhospital.je ‘Other Project Presentations’, not easily found) after the parish meeting on 9 June so multitudes who could not attend/vote can actually see them (including all four photos of rusting equipment etc, apparently the reason we need a new hospital).
One thing is extremely clear, an unlimited budget with no expense spared, either with unbelievably extensive ongoing works just to compile these pages or with the massive, continuous public relations exercise.
Yes, we do need convincing, but no, we don’t need continuous glossy leaflets posted to every Islander. All this before 30-ish buildings are demolished and vast alterations to the access road begin (all other required roadworks for access roads from the north etc, not mentioned). Years of expense still before any expenditure on ‘our’ hospital.
We are in the midst of unprecedented economic meltdown. Almost 20 ‘extra’ million has already been taken from important projects towards this one ‘world-class’ project, which is hemorrhaging money (will a billion be enough?) yet still it has no budget so apparently this is ok.
‘Our’ hospital is the vision of a few ministers determined to ignore all criticism, not just from the many residents who live within this large area and will be vastly affected (eg roads closed for periods totaling years), but from an increasing number who are realising this impossible, inaccessible, difficult site cannot be built on without many hundreds of extra millions.
Why decide a long list of extremely relevant criteria plus commission expensive experts’ reports to determine the site of ‘our hospital’ then ignore it all? The government itself was insistent upon a ‘one-site’ hospital, but clearly this is not happening at Overdale. The government’s own Planning policy is breached with the height of the planned building (incorporating vast areas of empty space, 50 winters of heating bills).
When will all those other elected politicians, who should be making good decisions for all of us and spending our money wisely, actually disagree with the determined few who are forgetting it is not actually their money and Jersey is supposed to be run democratically?
Related
Most read this week...
More from the JEP
JT’s purchase of Manx Telecom clears final regulatory hurdle
Bulls pay the ultimate penalty as Whyteleafe end fairytale run
Jèrriais film tells story of Island’s native language
Jersey Post climbs out of the red, with profit-making year