To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Quicker action is needed on assisted dying in Jersey
Share this:
SO, Health Minister Richard Renouf’s citizens’ jury has come out 78% in favour of the passing of appropriate legislation for assisted dying. This is within a percentage point or two of the results of other surveys carried out in the Island over the past few years and thus it is hardly a surprise. There was absolutely no point in insisting on this procedure and thus it was merely a delaying tactic.
From the information now available, it appears that:
lThe report of the citizens’ jury which has been released is only a preliminary one and we have to await the formal ‘all-singing-all-dancing’ report. However it is dressed up, it can hardly arrive at a conclusion other than that already announced.
lWe will then proceed to a States debate. However, this will only be ‘in principle’ and will then have to be followed by a further debate to consider actual law drafting. It is mooted that this first debate might take place in September.
lThen comes Christmas…
lWith the politicians concentrating on the imminent elections, will they really be willing to hold a meaningful debate on the question of assisted dying?
lThen comes the 2022 election…
Taking all this into account, it seems unlikely that the appropriate legislation will be in place until sometime in 2023. Meanwhile, people will be condemned to suffer unnecessarily, waiting on the whims of those in positions of authority.
What is to stop the States from moving to a full and comprehensive debate as soon as the summer recess is over? The law officers might then be instructed to
draft legislation as a matter of prime urgency.
Surely the first and foremost criterion must be compassion for those in agony who wish to have a peaceful death on their own terms? The schedules of the politicians and the civil servants must come a very poor second.
Related
Most read this week...
More from the JEP
JT’s purchase of Manx Telecom clears final regulatory hurdle
Bulls pay the ultimate penalty as Whyteleafe end fairytale run
Jèrriais film tells story of Island’s native language
Jersey Post climbs out of the red, with profit-making year