To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
If a bridge to France is a technical possibility, it is worthy of consideration
Share this:
FUNNY how folk react to things. Ask me about a bridge to France, for instance, and I’d immediately wonder whether it was technically possible. It is? Neat, bring it on.
You see, I’m a sucker for big infrastructure projects. They’re inherently exciting and we all like seeing stuff being done. Especially when that leads to sustainable and positive economic benefits. So sticking with the bridge example, I’d then be asking what the advantages are.
Yet so many in Jersey have reacted to Kevin Keen’s suggestion about a physical link to France in a frankly baffling way. It would end the Island’s independence, destroy its way of life and wipe out its culture, identity and people, social media foamed and fretted.
Eh? Are you all mad? That stuff’s long gone. It was sold out/replaced (delete according to age and wealth) when folk realised that working in an office with a couple of holidays a year and a centrally heated home was preferable to digging potatoes in the driving rain or rioting in the street because the States just devalued the liard to six to the sou – as they did in 1729.
Fewer than half of you are proper Crapauds; your birth rate’s falling and without immigration Jersey has no future. Well, unless you wish to return to eating vraic and limpets I suppose.
So, forget about the good old days. Despite your fond-but-faulty memories, no one wants to return to Izal (ask your gran) and outside privvies.
Which means maintaining a vibrant economy with well-paid jobs, a congenial tax regime and plenty of reasons for people to want to come here – or, increasingly, remain here.
Guernsey has similar problems. Or, if you’re Gus from Drop the Dead Donkey, ‘opportunities’. So one of our leading business leaders has suggested a tunnel to Jersey.
Think about it a bit, and you realise that the 20 minute drive means Guernsey could abandon its airport and use yours instead, because it’s bigger, better and with greater connectivity. In return, Jersey gets to use Guernsey’s non-tidal harbour and access times to St Helier are actually reduced.
Link the two islands to France and the possibilities suddenly explode. A major, modern hospital an hour’s drive away? That’ll do nicely for two islands trying to justify full health services on cottage hospital populations.
I’m not going to labour this because the bridge – and our tunnel – is at this stage a flight of fancy. But it has merit because other remote communities elsewhere have benefitted hugely from such links and been able to fund them.
So why not here? Realistically, the only thing preventing such developments is our own narrow-mindedness and, to be blunt, prejudices.
I mean, what’s wrong with thinking the unthinkable? After all, with a straight face Jersey is contemplating a 100-year plan to protect the Island from rising sea levels.
Good luck with that. The last time a Jerseyman looked around and mused, ‘you know, that’s a bloney high tide’, you were still part of France and Doggerland was being engulfed by a megatsunami caused by a submarine landslide off the coast of Norway.
True, that was back in 6200BC and civil engineering has moved on a bit, but expecting to protect all 70km of your coastline is still a mammoth undertaking.
It’s also expensive (although as yet uncosted), which means there’s a certain irony to the project.
If you look at it this way, Jersey’s gearing up without a murmur to spend colossal amounts erecting walls around itself but won’t contemplate reaching out to build bridges with its French cousins.
I find that odd, especially since your economy is pretty fragile. An analysis by accountant Richard Hemans in the CI magazine Business Brief shows GDP per capita here is 17% below Guernsey’s.
Crucially, he says, Jersey’s dependence on finance, and banking in particular, is falling ‘but it is struggling to replace it with another engine of growth’.
Cue Mr Keen’s bridge. If feasible, there’s a guaranteed income stream and what should be a real engine for growth – possibly more relevant now given the question marks over Condor and your popular French connection since the ferry company’s up for sale.
So, ask me about a bridge to France and I’d have to be convinced that it physically couldn’t be done before dropping the idea. There’s too much to be gained if you can turn that vision into reality.
Related
Most read this week...
More from the JEP
“This is daylight robbery” – Check-in staff encouraged to meet £200 per flight charging target
Five UK transferees join States police
Tranquilisation of dementia patients “nice and low” year after crackdown
“Unusual” case sees 70-year-old avoid jail over knife attack