Proposal for temporary Entitled to Work scheme rejected by the States

364151948 (36263785)

REGISTERED individuals will not receive temporary Entitled to Work status, after ministers rejected a backbencher’s proposition, criticising its numerous ‘drawbacks’.

Speaking on behalf of the absent Chief Minister, Deputy Lucy Stephenson said there was a ‘simpler, quicker and more effective way to support local businesses experiencing staff shortages’.

The proposition was brought forward by Deputy Raluca Kovacs, who called for a temporary scheme which would allow any registered individual who had been continuously resident in Jersey since 31 December 2020 to be eligible for Entitled to Work status until December 2025 – or until they attained five-year residency.

Under current regulations, those who have lived in Jersey for less than five years are prevented from taking up work in many of the roles for which employers are finding it difficult to recruit staff.

Deputy Kovacs also requested that the scheme be extended to spouses, civil partners or eligible partners who were also resident in Jersey, while the proposition’s third and final part asked the government to investigate the implications of the temporary reduction of the five-year residency requirement.

After a lengthy debate, 31 Members voted against the proposition with 11 in favour – all ten Reform Jersey members and Constable Simon Crowcroft.

Deputy Kovacs said she wanted to address areas where there were staff shortages, such as hospitality, retail, construction and care, saying: ‘There are skilled people already living here, vacancies for them to fill, and a desperate need for them to do so.’

She said: ‘It would make them likely to want to continue to make Jersey their home, and by allowing partners this as well, they will continue to want to stay here and raise a family. This is a unique opportunity that won’t come again, where we have a limited time space, with limited consequences, and no impact on housing and benefits. It will not open any floodgates or cause havoc in the labour market.’

However, States Members not associated with Reform Jersey picked apart the proposition, claiming it was under-researched, not rooted in evidence and too complex to enact.

Deputy Stephenson said: ‘There are a number of drawbacks, over and above the need to draft legislation.’

These included how individuals would prove continuous residency in Jersey since 2020, that businesses would have a ‘flow of workers in both directions’, with some opting to move toward the finance sector and causing ‘serious disruption to businesses’, and too much administrative strain on the government department which processes changes of entitlement.

Environment Minister Jonathan Renouf expressed the view that there was a ‘contradiction’ in the proposition, saying: ‘It will lead to job shortages somewhere.’

– Advertisement –
– Advertisement –