To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Letters to the Editor: Prescription charges are on the way – just wait and see
Share this:
The article was only their cynical way of letting us get used to it.
It is to be hoped that exemptions will be made in certain areas, for example, families with young children, and retired people. Invariably it is always the most vulnerable in our society who suffer most. Vetting is necessary.
We pay a fortune to doctors, we pay for X-rays and home family care is not cheap.
I paid £160 for a shingles vaccine from a leading chemist (I have the receipt) and paid the doctor to administer it. I think it’s obscene that doctors are paid a £20 subsidy for each visit, which is seldom as long as ten minutes. How many of them are not very comfortable?
On Health, when will the future of St Saviour’s Hospital be discussed? My deeply held suspicion is that it will be sold to a greedy developer for a pittance and become flats.
In my view, that is where our new hospital should be built. A building on land the States own, no compulsory purchase necessary, ample parking, and with a constant transport system for out patients with no transport or for those who do not drive. The disruption, noise and general upheaval which will occur during the renovation and construction of our chosen site will be absolutely horrendous and an absolute nightmare for elderly recuperation.
It is a safe bet the project will run countless millions over budget. I am informed that only a handful of extra beds, or none at all, will be provided at the end of it all, which is illogical in view of the rapidly rising population. I struggle to identify any major problems facing Jersey that are not directly or indirectly caused by the States persistent failure to control unskilled labour, who earn below the tax threshold or, through no fault of their own, cannot contribute to the £73,000 it costs to educate a child.
When will this be discussed?
The fact that Jersey pays the lowest minimum wage in the UK, and the fact there are three food banks in this wealthy Island does not embarrass them either.
I feel that a special mention should go to the Roman Catholic St Vincent de Paul Society which has been helping people in Jersey almost forever.
Chief Minister Ian Gorst seems to be out of touch (JEP 1 April) with the current state of play, which reinforces the opinion of many that this Island is run by the rich for the rich!
JEP Extra is more than just your daily newspaper. It’s multimedia package which delivers the paper to your door, your mobile and your tablet or PC daily
Related