Forty-five ex-politicians and activists have been sentenced to four to 10 years in prison in Hong Kong’s biggest national security case under a Beijing-imposed law that crushed a once-thriving pro-democracy movement.
They were prosecuted under the 2020 national security law for their roles in an unofficial primary election.
Prosecutors said their aim was to paralyse Hong Kong’s government and force the city’s leader to resign by aiming to win a legislative majority and using it to block government budgets indiscriminately.
But authorities cancelled the official legislative election, citing public health risks during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Legal scholar Benny Tai, whom the judges called the mastermind, received the longest sentence of 10 years. The judges said the sentences had been reduced for defendants who said they were unaware the plan was unlawful.
But the court said the penalties were not reduced for Tai and former politician Alvin Yeung because they were lawyers who were “absolutely adamant in pushing for the implementation of the scheme”.
Two of the 47 original defendants were acquitted earlier this year. The rest either pleaded guilty or were found guilty of conspiracy to commit subversion.
The judges said in their verdict that the activists’ plans to effect change through the unofficial primary would have undermined the government’s authority and created a constitutional crisis.
The judges rejected the reasoning from some defendants that the scheme would never have materialised, stating that “all the participants had put in every endeavour to make it a success”.
“When the primary election took place on July 10 and 11, no-one had remotely mentioned the fact that primary election was no more than an academic exercise and that the scheme was absolutely unattainable,” the judgment read.
“In order to succeed, the organisers and participants might have hurdles to overcome, that however was expected in every subversion case where efforts were made to overthrow or paralyse a government.”
Some of the defendants waved at their relatives in the courtroom after they were sentenced.
“We dared to confront the regime with the question: Will democracy ever be possible within such a structure? The answer was a complete crackdown on all fronts of society,” she wrote.
Observers said the trial illustrated how authorities suppressed dissent following huge anti-government protests in 2019, alongside media crackdowns and reduced public choice in elections.
The drastic changes reflected how Beijing’s promise to retain the former British colony’s civil liberties for 50 years when it returned to China in 1997 was increasingly threadbare, they said.
The sentencing drew criticism from foreign governments and human rights organisations.
Hong Kong’s last British governor Chris Patten said in a statement that the sentencing was “not only an affront to the people of Hong Kong, but those who value rights and freedoms around the world”.
He condemned the “sham” sentences, calling on the British government not to allow the results of the case to go unnoticed. He said the activists were an integral part of the city’s pro-democracy movement.
“The defendants were aggressively prosecuted and jailed for peacefully participating in normal political activity protected under Hong Kong’s Basic Law,” the statement said, referring to the city’s mini-constitution.
Hong Kong secretary for security Chris Tang said in a news briefing that the sentences showed those committing national security crimes must be severely punished.
