To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Civil Service logic of Yes, Minister!
Share this:
From Darius Pearce.
I AM concerned that it is taking an inordinate amount of time to find the most imperceptible of cuts in public expenditure.
Spending a small fortune on compiling a report to look at how to save money is an example of the perverse Civil Service logic that Yes, Minister! was based on.
We now have more people as a percentage, employed by the government, than any communist country during the Soviet era, and those countries collapsed under the burden of their own bureaucracies.
As we gradually see the finance industry fade quietly away to less over-regulated jurisdictions with more cost-effective labour, it is time to ask how we are going to pay for the legacy of civil service excess that Senator Ozouf will inherit.
The time has come to think big. Simplify the benefits system. Combining pensions and income support into a single weekly payment to each and every person of sufficient residency in Jersey would not only allow us to dispense with the entire Social Security department but would bring an end to the inherent age discrimination of the current system, disparity amplified by civil service discretion, often leading to the most terrible of inequities.
I realise that at first you may wonder how this would be paid for, but a significant proportion of persons in Jersey are currently in receipt of a benefit of some description and all persons employed by the government could have their wages decreased by a compensatory amount.
The loss of the 12.5% social security tax could be replaced by an additional 5% on income tax which would not require any additional civil servants to administer, and would be fairer as it would not be capped for the higher earners among us.
The final added benefit is that it would once more enable Jersey people to compete with foreign workers as they would then be able to work for lower wages and still maintain a reasonable standard of living.
Of course the States could simply bring the inevitable end to the civil service pension scheme, sooner, rather than later.
Related