To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Are people afraid to speak out against assisted dying?
Share this:
ALTHOUGH the loudest voices heard are from those who are pro assisted dying, a lot of people are not in favour. I think people are afraid of speaking out against assisted dying/suicide, in case they are thought uncaring.
In fact, this is not true and there is great appreciation of both sides of the situation. My original intention in writing was Chris Blackstone’s letter (JEP 9 February) regarding some statistics. Since then I have read the moving account of Alain du Chemin and my heart does go out to him.
However, if people want to end their life there are a number of ways to do so without involving other people. Obviously a lot of people are already doing so, by taking ‘control’ over how and when they end their life. This is the constant cry from those who are pro assisted dying/suicide. This is happening without a change in the law, which will affect our society as a whole.
It is thought that if we put ‘safeguards’ in place, the road to euthanasia will be prevented. You only have to look at what has happened since the introduction of an Abortion Law in 1967 to stop back-street abortions with ‘safeguards’. The latest step being ‘at home’ abortions with a telephone call and tablets in the post, which have had some serious consequences.
With regard to the statistics in Mr Blackstone’s letter, the Arts Centre only seats 250 people. About 85% of these meetings would have been about 212 people. Mr Blackstone does not say how many people actually completed the survey, but I don’t think it was more than 2,000. Again 85% of this is about 1,700. In a population of 110,000 these numbers are very small, 1,922 approximately. A petition also attracted 1,861 in 2019. All these may also be the same people voting in the different situations – I was at the Arts Centre and I did the online survey. People should not be fooled by statistics.
I hope that the people on the Citizens’ Jury will be encouraged to research the different jurisdictions (there are very few who have legalised euthanasia), and the different experiences of people in other countries, good and bad. The decision will have far-reaching consequences for more people than just those in agreement who I think are very much in the minority.
35 Clos de Balmain,
Undercliffe Road,
St Helier.
For more comment and opinion pieces, see today’s Jersey Evening Post
Related
Most read this week...
More from the JEP
One arrested after Le Braye crash leaves car ablaze
Teaching unions renew calls for better working conditions for members
Event to raise awareness for children with additional needs
Darts inter insular promises a close contest