To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Queen’s Valley: Do those protesters feel the same way today?
Share this:
From Glen Donaldson.
I WALKED round Queen’s Valley Reservoir last Sunday and on seeing the incredibly low level of the water reserves, several thoughts came to mind.
In Grouville – The History of a Country Parish, it records the initial report of May 1976 regarding the desirability of flooding Queen’s Valley.
Later, it reported that on Sunday 23rd May, 1976, 2000 people walked the length of the valley in protest. In October of that year, Senator John Averty took a petition signed by 6,000 to the States asking for a public inquiry.
About this time, my late wife and I motored the length of Queen’s Valley on two occasions, and later walked the length in each direction. We appreciated the tranquillity and beauty of the valley, but we did not encounter any other pedestrians or motorists on either occasion. In 1985, a second protest march was led by Dr David Bellamy, accompanied by 12,000 people. One wonders how many of these protesters visited the valley before flooding became an issue.
Now the walkways around the reservoir have become popular with the general public, fishermen, junior school cross-country runs, etc., and have also provided sites of remembrance for lost loved ones.
If the petitioners and lobbyists had had their way, what sort of crisis would now have to be dealt with?
I suggest that anyone asked to sign a petition or join a protest march should look to the future and carefully consider all implications before letting their heart rule their head.
Related
Most read this week...
More from the JEP
Wimbledon serve a masterclass as Jersey fall at the final hurdle
Bulls leave it late for crucial win at Beckenham
Longevity framework for Jersey launched
The only way is up – extreme adventure lines up on Jersey starting line