A “permissive culture” exists around fraud, and more joined-up action is needed to prevent scams from happening in the first place, according to a House of Lords committee.
A new corporate criminal offence of “failure to prevent fraud” should be introduced, to help incentivise all industries to play their part in combating scams, the Fraud Act 2006 and Digital Fraud Committee urged.
The telecoms sector must do more to tackle scam messages before they reach victims and combat spoof calls, while the tech sector must slam the brakes on fraudsters using online advertising and social media platforms to reel in consumers, the committee said.
Plans to hold platforms to account via the Online Safety Bill for online fraudulent advertising appearing on their services must not be allowed to slide and should be strengthened, it added.
“Until all fraud-enabling industries fear significant financial, legal and reputational risk for their failure to prevent fraud, they will not act,” the report said.
It continued: “The private sector must be encouraged to combat fraud not only through facing the threat of corporate criminal liability or regulatory action, but also through the creation of a safe harbour for the sharing of data for the purposes of preventing fraud.
“It is only through a holistic approach involving every part of the fraud chain that fraud will be prevented upstream before money leaves a victim’s account.”
Payments should be delayed in certain circumstances to allow more time for banks to review risks and contact customers, the committee suggested.
When fraudulent payments do slip through the net, it should not be the sole responsibility of the financial services sector, in particular the victim’s bank, to pick up the bill, it said.
The committee also called for a “united, centrally-led public awareness campaign that takes its lead from best practice exhibited in public health campaigns”, to help tackle fraud.
The report said: “Without fear of facing investigation or justice, organised criminals around the world turn to the UK as a lucrative market to commit fraud.
“They know that they can operate with limited fear of prosecution or redress for their crimes, the proceeds of which they use to fund further criminal activity including human trafficking and the drugs trade, and they do not have any regard for their victims.”
Law enforcement agencies are “chronically underfunded” for fighting fraud and Action Fraud, the UK’s reporting centre for fraud and cyber crime, remains inactive and misunderstood, the committee said.
The report said: “The effect of such under-prioritisation has been to create a permissive culture across Government and law enforcement agencies towards fraud and the criminals who perpetrate it.
“This then permeates through to affect the attitudes of private sector players in the fraud chain, which describes the steps involved in a fraud, who have not stepped in to do what they can to prevent consumers being scammed.”
It said a Cabinet sub-committee should be set up with a clear mandate to tackle fraud.
Fraud is the most commonly experienced crime in England and Wales, accounting for approximately 41% of all crime against individuals, the report said.
“If citizens were being routinely mugged and having millions of pounds stolen from their wallets in broad daylight, every organisation involved in allowing this to happen would have no choice but to deal with it swiftly, and the perpetrators would be brought to justice in court,” it said.
“Because most fraud is now happening online and often involves social engineering of the victim, the exponential growth in fraud and scams has been invisible and fraudsters face little risk of being caught. This has to stop.”
Having been socially engineered by fraudsters, many victims will face a crisis of confidence and lose trust in authorities and people, the report added.
She continued: “Actually it’s really missing the point about the devastation – emotional devastation – that this crime can cause.
“And it would not be allowed to happen, and carry on, if people were being mugged in broad daylight for thousands of pounds.”
Baroness Morgan also said there is a “misperception that different institutions can’t talk to each other, share data, when they know that people potentially are being defrauded”.
Referring to the impacts that fraud has on society, she told PA: “If you talk to any victims, as we have done, who have been defrauded, it’s not just about the money, it’s about a breach of trust.
“And it’s emotionally devastating and people (find it) very difficult then to trust again in any institution that asks for your details or (when) buying things online.
“And as people have been buying more online, they need to be able to buy with confidence, to be able to transfer money – and to know that actually every part of the fraud chain is being cracked down on.”
Rocio Concha, Which? director of policy and advocacy, said: “The lack of a joined-up approach between different business sectors is holding back the fight against fraud and leaving consumers exposed to unscrupulous scammers.”
A Government spokesperson said: “We remain absolutely committed to preventing callous predators from stealing cash from hard-working families.
“We will shortly publish our Fraud Strategy which details how we will stop fraud attempts at source, empower potential victims to recognise and avoid fraud and prosecute more perpetrators.”
Alex Davies-Jones, Labour’s shadow minister for digital and tech, said: “Labour has been pushing Government for years to strengthen protections against fraud and scams.”