Ex-CIA officer handed 20 years for spying for China
A jury convicted Kevin Mallory last year of providing classified information to Chinese handlers in exchange for 25,000 dollars (£20,000).
A former CIA officer has been sentenced to 20 years in prison on charges that he spied for China and sought to expose agents who were once his responsibility.
The sentence handed to Kevin Mallory, 62, of Leesburg, Virginia, is less than the life term sought by prosecutors but more than the 10 years requested by the defence.
A jury convicted Mallory last year under the Espionage Act for providing classified information to Chinese handlers in exchange for 25,000 dollars (£20,000).
Mallory’s scheme began to unravel when he was selected for secondary screening at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport in April 2017 on a flight back from Shanghai with his son, and customs agents found 16,500 dollars (£13,000) in unreported cash.
Later, in voluntary interviews with authorities, he was caught off guard when a phone given to him by the Chinese displayed text conversations between Mallory and the Chinese recruiter. He had expected the phone’s secure messaging features to keep the conversation hidden.
In one text message, Mallory wrote: “Your object is to gain information, and my object is to be paid.”
“At its heart, this was a very basic crime,” prosecutor John Gibbs said during the sentencing hearing. “He was desperate for money, and the most valuable thing he had was our nation’s secrets.”
Mr Gibbs said the 25,000 dollars was just the beginning of what would have occurred if he had not been caught.
His sentence was delayed multiple times as US District Judge TS Ellis III, sitting in federal court in Alexandria, sought clarity on a key point — the value of the information provided by Mallory.
In particular, prosecutors and defence lawyers differed sharply on whether he intended to put human assets at risk.
Much of the evidence in the case remains classified and even a portion of Friday’s sentencing hearing was closed to the public, but at the bottom of it, prosecutors believe Mallory either sent or intended to send evidence that would have led to exposure of human assets described in court as “the Johnsons”.
Mr Gibbs said Mallory was the Johnsons’ handler when he worked at the CIA.
Defence lawyers said Mallory never intended to send it and pointed to computer forensic evidence supporting their claim.
Judge Ellis ruled that he could not determine conclusively that Mallory intended to send the information though he suspected the “long-term intentions” were sinister.
“If I had concluded that sources had been compromised … I would impose a far more severe sentence,” Judge Ellis said.
Defence lawyers pointed to the relatively small amount of money Mallory received, and the fact that he voluntarily disclosed his contacts with the Chinese to his former employers at the CIA.
But Judge Ellis said the amount of money was small only because Mallory was caught at an early stage in his relationship with the Chinese.
He said Mallory’s contacts with the CIA suggest an effort to cover his espionage with the Chinese with a veneer of legitimacy by portraying himself as some sort of double agent.
“If you choose to play footsie with another country … you have committed a crime,” Judge Ellis said. “Don’t think that you can be a double agent.”
Mallory’s lawyers said they plan to appeal against the conviction.
Care inquiry: ‘Jersey needs balance between migration controls and recruitment of key social workers’
Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.