Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn have clashed following the collapse of cross-party talks aimed at finding a Brexit compromise.
The Labour leader pulled the plug on negotiations after six weeks of talks, saying they had “gone as far as they can” and “we have been unable to bridge important policy gaps between us”.
Mr Corbyn also said the prospect of a change in Tory leadership meant the Government was “ever more unstable and its authority eroded” and Labour could not be confident in any cross-party agreement being delivered by her successor.
I have written to Theresa May to say that talks on finding a compromise agreement for leaving the European Union have gone as far as they can.
The government’s growing weakness and instability means there cannot be confidence in its ability to deliver. pic.twitter.com/H27qxDleaB
— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) May 17, 2019
But the Prime Minister highlighted Labour’s own divisions over the issue of a second referendum, saying they had made it impossible for a deal to be reached.
Allies of Mrs May pointed the finger at shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer, a key player in the negotiations, who has suggested that a deal would be unlikely to get through the Commons without a referendum attached.
She suggested that the option of indicative Commons votes to find out what MPs would be prepared to accept remained under consideration ahead of the Withdrawal Agreement Bill (WAB) being brought to Parliament for a showdown in the week beginning June 3.
“But when MPs come to vote on the Bill they will be faced with a stark choice: that is to vote to deliver on the referendum, to vote to deliver Brexit or to shy away from delivering Brexit with all the uncertainty that that would leave.”
The Government will now focus its efforts on trying to win over rebel Tories and the DUP, while hoping that Labour MPs can be persuaded to back the WAB based on the common ground established during the talks on areas including workers’ rights and environmental protections.
The Prime Minister is due to set out the timetable for her exit from Number 10 following the vote on the WAB and candidates to replace her are already jostling for position.
Downing Street said it became clear on Thursday night that it would be impossible to reach a full deal with Labour.
In a letter to Mrs May, Mr Corbyn said: “I believe the talks between us about finding a compromise agreement on leaving the European Union have now gone as far as they can.”
The cross-party talks included discussions on whether to hold a series of indicative votes before the second reading of the WAB, designed to enable to UK to leave the EU before July 31, leaked documents revealed.
On the prospect of indicative votes, the Labour leader said: “This is a novel process which we will obviously look at whenever it comes to Parliament.”
“In particular there have been very challenging discussions in respect of the different positions of the two sides on customs and the holding of a second referendum.”
No further discussions are planned with the Opposition, the spokesman confirmed.
He claimed Labour was now “95% of the way towards being a second referendum party”.
Brexiteer former international development secretary Priti Patel tweeted: “Many of us did question the judgment of the Cabinet when they approved those talks.”
Many of us did question the judgement of the Cabinet when they approved those talks… https://t.co/YO9qPfrWNN
— Priti Patel MP (@patel4witham) May 17, 2019
The failure to reach agreement was met with despair from business leaders, with the CBI calling on MPs to cancel the recess planned for the end of May.
CBI director-general Carolyn Fairbairn said: “Another day of failed politics, another dispiriting day for British business.
“Six wasted weeks while uncertainty paralyses our economy.”
Mrs May was campaigning in Bristol ahead of next week’s European elections, where the Tories are braced for a backlash from voters angry at her inability to deliver Brexit.
“Nigel Farage can’t deliver Brexit: every few years he pops up, he shouts from the sidelines, he doesn’t work constructively in the national interest.”
