Advertising

No official answers as fears over possible pollution grow

News | Published:

OFFICERS from the Environment Department are refusing to answer any questions about possible pollution problems arising from tidal-water flooding at the Horizon development on the Waterfront.

Flood water in the Horizon development at high tide on 21 March. Photo: John Baker. (24208354)

With spring tides of over 39 feet expected this weekend, environmentalists have raised fresh concerns that the water which floods portions of the site – where 280 luxury flats are under construction – and is then left to drain back into the sea may be picking up contaminants from landfill used when the area was reclaimed decades ago.

The issue was first brought to light last month as the excavation of the underground car park coincided with high tides and the seawater filled the area.

Photographs and videos of the flooded site and of visibly murky water in the marina have been widely shared among Islanders and in the media.

Environmental groups believe allowing the water to drain into the marina untreated breaches the site’s discharge permit.

On 21 February, environmental protection officers said ‘they were looking into reports’ but one month later, as the site has again flooded, it is unclear what action, if any, has been taken.

In response to questions on what was being done, the JEP was told only that the ‘incident is still under investigation’ and officers ‘were unable to comment further’.

The States press office has confirmed that the incident is being investigated under the Water Pollution (Jersey) Law 2000.

The co-ordinator of Save Our Shoreline Jersey is now calling on Environmental Protection to tell the public what is happening.

Advertising

The department is ‘failing in its duties to protect the public interest and the environment’, Dave Cabeldu wrote in a letter to the editor published on page 12 today. And he has highlighted the fact that the department is preparing to host a multinational environmental conference on marine biodiversity next week.

‘Jersey is a signatory to the OSPAR Convention and, as such, Jersey has agreed that it is illegal to discharge polluted material into the sea,’ he wrote. ‘The irony of the situation will not be lost on many observers.’

Mr Cabeldu – who recently received an MBE for his conservation work – said more should have been done over the last month.

‘Due to the urgency of the situation, the investigation should by now have been concluded and decisions taken as to how it could be mitigated,’ he wrote.

Advertising

He said that this weekend ‘there will be two spring tides exceeding 39 feet which could flush out further thousands of gallons of potentially toxic leachate from the Horizon site into the sea via the Elizabeth Marina’.

SOS have questioned whether the water discharge permit issued for the site is sufficient to protect the surrounding area.

Under the terms of the permit, discharge from the site, including groundwater, should be passed ‘through a settlement tank and sand filter’ before it is allowed to soak away at specific designated points.

The permit annex suggests this is to protect the environment from a variety of potential contaminants including arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel and selenium, among others.

‘An officer from the department informed a resident that the water discharge permit issued to the contractor did not cover the flushing out of contaminated material to sea but only groundwater accumulating after the initial excavation had been sealed,’ Mr Cabeldu’s letter said.

‘This makes a nonsense of, and is contrary to, the public understanding of the permit.’

The JEP tried to get clarification on whether tidal water is covered by the permit by approaching the government communications unit and sending direct questions to Natural Environment director Willie Peggie and director of Environmental Protection Tim Du Feu. Both responses to the inquiries came back from the communications unit, to say only that the investigation was ongoing and no further comment was being made. Another environmental group watching the situation has been taking their own water samples.

Andrew Le Quesne from Earth Project Jersey collected a sample yesterday as the tide was receding and visibly cloudy water was draining into the north-east corner of Elizabeth Marina.

He said he would be taking the sample to the States analyst.

The French contractors building on the Horizon site were asked for comment but no response was received by the time of going to press.

The States Assembly was told last week that a number of measures had now been implemented to stop silt entering the nearby Elizabeth Marina during high tides.

Assistant Treasury Minister Lyndsay Ash, speaking on behalf of the States as the sole shareholder in the Jersey Development Company, said he had met officials to discuss it.

‘They have installed a geo-textile membrane on the area where the deep excavations are taking place in order to act as a filter which will prevent silt from exiting the site on the fall of large tides,’ he said.

‘And they have committed not to carry out works in the area concerned during high tides, so as not to further disturb the soil.’

Tania Targett

By Tania Targett
Journalist

Advertising

Top Stories

Advertising

More from the JEP

UK & International News